Skip to main content

Anything for Freedom?

Free-dom [free-duhm]
noun

  1. the state of being free, rather than in confinement or under physical restraint.
  2. the power to determine action without restraint
  3. personal liberty, as opposed to bondage or slavery.


The attempt to "define" this word would be a futile attempt to confine the vastness of emotions associated with it. Thinkers, aristocrats, philosophers, artists, political leaders, governments and ordinary people throughout the history of humankind have defined freedom in ways convenient to the time.

Golshifteh Farahani
Iranian actress Golshifteh Farahani (Body of Lies fame) was banished from her home country of Iran - because she posed nude for a French news magazine, Le Figaro. According to the 28-year-old actress the aim of the photo is a symbolic gesture to remove the common taboos associated with nudity in society.

You can read more about this at 'Iran's "nude revolutionary" Farahani says image is symbolic'. This is not the first time Ms. Farahani is facing a scathing from her government. She was banned from leaving Iran after her debut in Ridley Scott's Body of Lies. And after her symbolic picture in the French magazine she has been banned from her home country. 


The Farahani incident just made me think about the meaning of "freedom". The image of "about to be executed" Mel Gibson (playing Sir William Wallace) shouting "Freedom" in the last scene of the movie, Braveheart, poignantly sums up the value attached with this sentiment. Many have lost their lives in the past to protect or attain freedom for themselves, their country or whales.


The Arab Spring that started in the December of 2010 overthrew some of the most powerful rulers in the Arab world. Thousands of protesters gathered in squares in these countries to raise their voices against the current regime. Some souls perished, while others sustained scars that would remain as a sign of freedom. 


The right to freedom of speech cherished in democracies around the world is a contentious issue as well. Incidents like, Apartheid, Danish cartoon controversy, Twitter censorship controversy, Liu Xiaobo controversy, Tea Party and other incidents that continuously have their share of limelight before fading into the darkness of injustice and corruption.


Last year I wrote an article on symbolism in life and movies. To quote from the article, "Symbolism plays an important role in our society. A picture is worth a thousand words". Who is on the right side of freedom? Or the word freedom is just a relative term! Perhaps it is alright for freedom to stay loosely defined. So us mortals can take this word and play with it until the day we get the meaning right. Freedom!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Scuba Diving 36 feet deep in Goa (Surreal but Nice!)

"Surreal but nice" that's what Hugh Grant's character managed to blurt out, mesmerized by the beauty of Julia Roberts (in the movie Notting Hill ). And this was the exact thought that was running in my mind as I was rising from a depth of over 35 feet under water in the Arabian Sea near Goa, India. I had just finished my first dive (rather second dive of my first dive) with grouper fish, tailor fish - and many more - knelt at the bottom of the ocean floor and touched a ship wreck that sunk more than sixty years ago! It was a surreal experience that has left me with a feeling of self-satisfaction as well as endless curiosity. The two feelings very rarely take a house together in my mind. Probably the last time they shacked up together was when I got an admit for my Master's from State University of New York . The feeling of gliding underwater among the fishes, water pressure trying to burst your ears drums, flying over huge boulders of rocks under sea; like an un...

How not to read History? Avoiding Sophistry, Deceitfulness, and Irrational Narratives

Introduction A few days ago I wrote on how a contemporary Dharmic mind is enslaved with various narratives meant to degrade the tradition of Dharmic spiritualism (or Hinduism) and relegate the spiritual path as non-sensical, patriarchal, and regressive (i.e. against modernity). I've three examples below that show the eagerness in contemporary conversations to push this narrative. Since free speech and vaad (Sanskrit: वाद, discussion) are two-way streets so it's well within my right to share my opinion based on sound reasoning and well-established examples. And my opinion doesn't rely on the play of words (Sanskrit: सामान्य छल, quibble)) or a mere attack on the opposition (Sanskrit: वितंडा, cavil/sophistry). Just a side note, these categorizations are based on the ancient  Nyaya philosophy composed by Akṣapāda Gautama between the 6th century BCE and the 2nd century CE. Example 1 -  वितंडा / Sophistry Buddhism and Sanatana Dharma have a long history of coexistence and assim...
The debate on Times Now Summit 2022 between Salman Khurshid, Dr. Vikram Sampath, Sai Deepak, and Pavan K Varma showed how disconnected the left, right, and the middle are from each other.  We all know these 'luminaries',  as Rahul Shivshankar, Editorial Director & Editor-in-Chief  @TimesNow introduces them.  How left and right  do not apply to Indian political viewpoints  is a matter for another time, therefore pardon my use of the western paradigm of left and right for the rest of this blog post. Times Now Debate, 2022 We all know Sai Deepak through his YouTube debate with  Asaduddin Owaisi  (Sai Deepak in fact moderated the debate) a few years back. And since then he has authored a couple of books on the historical context that surrounded the drafting of the constitution of India between 1946 to 1950. His first book on India, that is Bharat forced us to rethink colonialism and introduced an entirely distinct scholarly way to look at middle-e...