Skip to main content

The Vulnerable Lincoln of Daniel Day-Lewis

The Joker had a sinister motive when he asked his victims - why so serious? I asked the same question to me a little while ago; my motive was entirely benign. My thought process evolved from an interview of three-times Academy Award winner in Sun Times.

I saw Lincoln a few weeks back and enjoyed the experience. Steven Spielberg and Daniel Day-Lewis complement each other - the combination of aesthetics of direction and realism of method acting. I would love to talk about this more but some other day!

Lincoln is a revered figure in American history and with this comes the burden to portray the character as godlike. I would let a quote from the movie The Insider to put forth my sentiments about human beings who are now considered heroes.
Mike Wallace: Who are these people?Lowell Bergman: Ordinary people under extraordinary pressure, Mike. What the hell do you expect? Grace and consistency?
The movie Lincoln shows the extraordinary pressure on Abraham Lincoln - a human being with all the sweet & sour stuff that makes us human. Daniel Day-Lewis's Lincoln had to be human otherwise the movie would just turn out to be about a superhero with no "magical powers".

I wondered how he approached this character which came with the burden of responsibility and reverence. It was all made clear in few lines from his interview; you can read the rest of the interview here. I'll let Daniel Day-Lewis do the talking:

(quote) “Lincoln has been emblazoned in our minds,” he explains. “He has been re-created in ways that have made him dehumanized. It occurred to me that I felt this shyness around Lincoln combined with this reverence.

“Reverence is of no use to you at all when creating a character. If anything, you have to be a bit disrespectful when creating a life on film. It’s as if you have to walk straight up to a stranger and say, ‘Do you want to spend some time with me? Do you want to hang out with me … for a couple of years?’ ” 

There was the rub: “I was asking one of the great historical figures of all time to hang out with me.” (unquote)

In some way there is a life-lesson to be learned from his words. In our lives we take ourselves too seriously - the childlike playfulness seems to disappear as our bodies grow older. I wonder sometimes if I can ask the youthful-me to guide the older-me to some fun & vulnerable places.

PS: It's worth to spend around two-and-a-half of your lives on Lincoln. Although it's a feel-good historical film but it teaches so much more about the man not just the 16th President of United States.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Scuba Diving 36 feet deep in Goa (Surreal but Nice!)

"Surreal but nice" that's what Hugh Grant's character managed to blurt out, mesmerized by the beauty of Julia Roberts (in the movie Notting Hill ). And this was the exact thought that was running in my mind as I was rising from a depth of over 35 feet under water in the Arabian Sea near Goa, India. I had just finished my first dive (rather second dive of my first dive) with grouper fish, tailor fish - and many more - knelt at the bottom of the ocean floor and touched a ship wreck that sunk more than sixty years ago! It was a surreal experience that has left me with a feeling of self-satisfaction as well as endless curiosity. The two feelings very rarely take a house together in my mind. Probably the last time they shacked up together was when I got an admit for my Master's from State University of New York . The feeling of gliding underwater among the fishes, water pressure trying to burst your ears drums, flying over huge boulders of rocks under sea; like an un...

How not to read History? Avoiding Sophistry, Deceitfulness, and Irrational Narratives

Introduction A few days ago I wrote on how a contemporary Dharmic mind is enslaved with various narratives meant to degrade the tradition of Dharmic spiritualism (or Hinduism) and relegate the spiritual path as non-sensical, patriarchal, and regressive (i.e. against modernity). I've three examples below that show the eagerness in contemporary conversations to push this narrative. Since free speech and vaad (Sanskrit: वाद, discussion) are two-way streets so it's well within my right to share my opinion based on sound reasoning and well-established examples. And my opinion doesn't rely on the play of words (Sanskrit: सामान्य छल, quibble)) or a mere attack on the opposition (Sanskrit: वितंडा, cavil/sophistry). Just a side note, these categorizations are based on the ancient  Nyaya philosophy composed by Akṣapāda Gautama between the 6th century BCE and the 2nd century CE. Example 1 -  वितंडा / Sophistry Buddhism and Sanatana Dharma have a long history of coexistence and assim...

9000 days of destiny

I was wondering about my doubts and prejudices I have at this stage of life. It is in human trait to suffer from these emotions. But history has given enough evidence to form a case when humans have risen beyond their flaws I recently saw the movie "Invictus". It is based on the true events that lead to South African national rugby team, the Springboks, winning the 1995 rugby world cup. The movie shows how two persons from completely different backgrounds rose above their beliefs and prejudices to unite a country broken by apartheid. These were South African President Mr. Nelson Mandela and the captain of the South African rugby team Francois Pienaar.  Clint Eastwood directed this movie. It stars Morgan Freeman as Nelson Mandela and Matt Damon as Francois Pienaar. The movie is thought provoking and inspires you to dream big. It in its' limited time depicts the segregation created by decades of apartheid in South Africa. However I was captivated by the song played ...