Skip to main content

We need a Jon Stewart's The Daily Show kinda show in India!

Politics and political satire go hand in hand. A little bit of Googling on these two keywords would result in the likes of Aristophanes (called the prince of ancient comedy) to the modern day political satires in The Daily Show and The Colbert Nation on Comedy Central for those familiar with American television (or what's left of it after the flooding of realty shows that seem to defy rationality and creativity alike).

I'm a big fan of The Daily Show which tags itself as political comedy and fake news. The show manages to bring out the ridiculousness of the various so called "news" channels which have become sources of sensationalist media that impregnates facts with heavy doses of fiction to bloat the straight facts to a state of perpetual chaos and bytes of information that can be fed to people through tubes rather than be chewed intelligently.

IMHO! - Political parties are social unit of people whose aim is to gain authority and hopefully create enough positive impact to improve the lives of masses and ensure successful future for coming generations. In a way political parties are janitors whose aim should be to keep the society clean. Of course the duty of the masses is to continuously measure the cleanliness and ensure they also play a proactive role in the society at their own individual level. Umm..that's the extent of my dive into the political theory.

Purpose of this Post - This post is about the need of greater popularization of political satire in India (or for that matter any other country which the constitution guarantees the freedom of speech and expression). I won't go into the debate of freedom of speech when thrown into the chaos of religion or racialism. I would stick to pure bantering of political ecosystem in a country. A country is a pot boiling with various political ideologies that keep striking against each other to woo the masses to ensure their survival in the political system. 

A Concentric Ball Structure! - The apparent layer that permeates the information or ideologies of political parties to the masses is a secondary layer of political news disseminating structure formed by various forms of media (or communication) over the core ball made up of political parties. My imaginative mind imagines the political parties (governing as well as in opposition) as loudspeakers that blow out large amount of information that is both useful (consider economic plans, laws, ordinances etc.) as well as irrelevant bull (politically dividing conversations, human "politicians" with ridiculous ideologies that defy rationalism, irresponsible behaviour etc.).

That's a lot of information being thrown at the masses. The role of the media should not be to filter out this information but to tag this information into useful and ridiculous (pardon me but I can't seem to find a substitute for this word). However the media in last few decades have gone from information provider to sensationalism creator. It has become a powerhouse of churning quick selling information that is like the fast food of news. You just have to gulp it and it tastes good because it's been developed for taste buds not for suffering liver or pancreas!

Why do we need to popularize political satire? 

Political Satire is funny and informative - I would have to confess like a lot of twenty or thirty something I don't have the patience to watch mainstream media with so called "news". I don't have patience for ridiculousness in the news. I can patiently watch a serious documentary on a crisis or political commentary but I'm sorry I cannot watch sensationalism. 

Political Satire brings out the crux - In an article in NY Times on Jon Stewart (quote)..And they've done so in ways that straight news programs cannot: speaking truth to power in blunt, sometimes profane language, while using satire and playful looniness to ensure that their political analysis never becomes solemn or pretentious (unquote).

Political Satire brings laughter - Not a very serious point but in today's news where the focus is on creating sensationalism which I'm not sure is so good for either our brain or heart, a good dose of laughter is all we need at the end. A political satire serves the dual purpose of bringing out laughter as well as information.

These are a few reasons I think we need to popularize political satire and probably need an India The Daily Show. There are a few contenders I think but we need serious fun-filled political commentary to sane out the blah-blah of political parties as well as the sensationalism of so called mainstream media. A quick Google search of "Political Satire in India" is a good starting point to workout your brains in this subject!

A joke is a joke. There's an expression - I don't know if you have it - that's 'adding insult to injury.'
Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/j/jon_stewart.html#WuE5gorcHHbGDpTg.99

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Scuba Diving 36 feet deep in Goa (Surreal but Nice!)

"Surreal but nice" that's what Hugh Grant's character managed to blurt out, mesmerized by the beauty of Julia Roberts (in the movie Notting Hill ). And this was the exact thought that was running in my mind as I was rising from a depth of over 35 feet under water in the Arabian Sea near Goa, India. I had just finished my first dive (rather second dive of my first dive) with grouper fish, tailor fish - and many more - knelt at the bottom of the ocean floor and touched a ship wreck that sunk more than sixty years ago! It was a surreal experience that has left me with a feeling of self-satisfaction as well as endless curiosity. The two feelings very rarely take a house together in my mind. Probably the last time they shacked up together was when I got an admit for my Master's from State University of New York . The feeling of gliding underwater among the fishes, water pressure trying to burst your ears drums, flying over huge boulders of rocks under sea; like an un...

How not to read History? Avoiding Sophistry, Deceitfulness, and Irrational Narratives

Introduction A few days ago I wrote on how a contemporary Dharmic mind is enslaved with various narratives meant to degrade the tradition of Dharmic spiritualism (or Hinduism) and relegate the spiritual path as non-sensical, patriarchal, and regressive (i.e. against modernity). I've three examples below that show the eagerness in contemporary conversations to push this narrative. Since free speech and vaad (Sanskrit: वाद, discussion) are two-way streets so it's well within my right to share my opinion based on sound reasoning and well-established examples. And my opinion doesn't rely on the play of words (Sanskrit: सामान्य छल, quibble)) or a mere attack on the opposition (Sanskrit: वितंडा, cavil/sophistry). Just a side note, these categorizations are based on the ancient  Nyaya philosophy composed by Akṣapāda Gautama between the 6th century BCE and the 2nd century CE. Example 1 -  वितंडा / Sophistry Buddhism and Sanatana Dharma have a long history of coexistence and assim...

9000 days of destiny

I was wondering about my doubts and prejudices I have at this stage of life. It is in human trait to suffer from these emotions. But history has given enough evidence to form a case when humans have risen beyond their flaws I recently saw the movie "Invictus". It is based on the true events that lead to South African national rugby team, the Springboks, winning the 1995 rugby world cup. The movie shows how two persons from completely different backgrounds rose above their beliefs and prejudices to unite a country broken by apartheid. These were South African President Mr. Nelson Mandela and the captain of the South African rugby team Francois Pienaar.  Clint Eastwood directed this movie. It stars Morgan Freeman as Nelson Mandela and Matt Damon as Francois Pienaar. The movie is thought provoking and inspires you to dream big. It in its' limited time depicts the segregation created by decades of apartheid in South Africa. However I was captivated by the song played ...