Skip to main content

Pictures are Worth a Thousand Tension

Somebody rightly said that pictures are worth a thousand words. And by that magnitude a moving picture is perhaps worth a million times more. I can only imagine the impact the first motion picture created over a hundred years ago would have had on someone. It's something about motion that attracts the mind; whether it's a river flowing over the rocks making it's way to the ocean or some gyrating to the sound of nothing.

Technology has advanced from Eadweard Muybridge's photography to Thomas Edison's motion picture to modern day movies from across the world that include works of art cinema, drama, documentaries, pornography to rovers walking on planets thousands of miles away! And the technological advances continue with every new model of phone or camera.

As the world adopted the technology everything in last few decades got recorded on either a magnetic tapes and finally onto silicon chips in form of zeroes and ones. And somewhere on the course of this advancement television became an indelible part of our lives. I remember the first color television set my father bought to watch a new Indian TV drama! 

And with internet and television information became prevalent. If you want to get some news you can go to cable TV or Youtube or Facebook or Twitter on your phone, television and laptop. It's so easily available in any form and from anywhere. And the news that you weren't even aware of is suddenly a concerning part of your daily life.

And with 24 hour news channels it's so easy to get sucked into the biases of the news corporation, news anchors or ever present talk show hosts. It's a barrage of visuals in front of you, whether it's the video of people rioting, protests, blasts, looting or famous people complaining about trivial matters. It's just negativity everywhere, CNN, Fox News, Discovery Channel, ESPN or any other channel you switch on your TV.

And with these visuals the tendency to make an immediate judgement sets in. These news channels indirectly, or sometimes directly as well, promote stereotypes, irrational fear, biased opinions and worst of all is apathy to certain things because of incessant repetition. 

I sometimes wonder the days when people would sit around lamps in the house and just read. Were they better off? I guess not, if you look at some of the crimes that were committed in the ancient world it seems the same biases were present. So as human beings are we flawed such that the opinions, decisions or actions we create in our minds and heart would be at best a reflection of our inner misgivings?

So is there something we can do be better? Yes, instead of forming opinions through videos, visuals it is sometimes better to be old-fashioned and just read about whatever you're interested in. As the saying goes don't judge the book by the cover, similarly don't judge the situation by the visual flashing before your eyes. Take your time and read and read and read.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Scuba Diving 36 feet deep in Goa (Surreal but Nice!)

"Surreal but nice" that's what Hugh Grant's character managed to blurt out, mesmerized by the beauty of Julia Roberts (in the movie Notting Hill ). And this was the exact thought that was running in my mind as I was rising from a depth of over 35 feet under water in the Arabian Sea near Goa, India. I had just finished my first dive (rather second dive of my first dive) with grouper fish, tailor fish - and many more - knelt at the bottom of the ocean floor and touched a ship wreck that sunk more than sixty years ago! It was a surreal experience that has left me with a feeling of self-satisfaction as well as endless curiosity. The two feelings very rarely take a house together in my mind. Probably the last time they shacked up together was when I got an admit for my Master's from State University of New York . The feeling of gliding underwater among the fishes, water pressure trying to burst your ears drums, flying over huge boulders of rocks under sea; like an un...

How not to read History? Avoiding Sophistry, Deceitfulness, and Irrational Narratives

Introduction A few days ago I wrote on how a contemporary Dharmic mind is enslaved with various narratives meant to degrade the tradition of Dharmic spiritualism (or Hinduism) and relegate the spiritual path as non-sensical, patriarchal, and regressive (i.e. against modernity). I've three examples below that show the eagerness in contemporary conversations to push this narrative. Since free speech and vaad (Sanskrit: वाद, discussion) are two-way streets so it's well within my right to share my opinion based on sound reasoning and well-established examples. And my opinion doesn't rely on the play of words (Sanskrit: सामान्य छल, quibble)) or a mere attack on the opposition (Sanskrit: वितंडा, cavil/sophistry). Just a side note, these categorizations are based on the ancient  Nyaya philosophy composed by Akṣapāda Gautama between the 6th century BCE and the 2nd century CE. Example 1 -  वितंडा / Sophistry Buddhism and Sanatana Dharma have a long history of coexistence and assim...

9000 days of destiny

I was wondering about my doubts and prejudices I have at this stage of life. It is in human trait to suffer from these emotions. But history has given enough evidence to form a case when humans have risen beyond their flaws I recently saw the movie "Invictus". It is based on the true events that lead to South African national rugby team, the Springboks, winning the 1995 rugby world cup. The movie shows how two persons from completely different backgrounds rose above their beliefs and prejudices to unite a country broken by apartheid. These were South African President Mr. Nelson Mandela and the captain of the South African rugby team Francois Pienaar.  Clint Eastwood directed this movie. It stars Morgan Freeman as Nelson Mandela and Matt Damon as Francois Pienaar. The movie is thought provoking and inspires you to dream big. It in its' limited time depicts the segregation created by decades of apartheid in South Africa. However I was captivated by the song played ...