Skip to main content

Don't let your aversion to '-ism' avert you from Philosophy

We all are aware of the remarks by Tamil actor Rajinikanth that have been circulating the airwaves this week. I don't have to repeat the remarks as I don't intend to write about the remarks nor I want to get into a discussion about the life of EVR Ramasamy who has been hailed as a South Indian Socrate-like reformist as well as described as having led a controversial life that bordered on racial ideology

I will only end this chain of thought by saying that relooking at the past requires an open mind that should have the courage to acknowledge all aspects of history as a student. It's far too easy to kowtow to one side of the event by letting the prejudice overcome your mind leading to selective deafness. Rationality is an aspect of mind that is far too often succumbing to fear-mongering and stupidity. 

I only intend to talk about openness of mind. I've observed that it's quite easy to say "I was never religious" or "I'm spiritual" or "I'm atheist" or "I'm agnostic" etc. without really a rational argument that goes above superficial prejudice and lack of research. I have heard these words far too often from the mouth of fellow human beings, which makes me wonder if it is a growing fashion to shut the mind to explore the philosophical aspects of life any further. To think of it even Periyar held a strong affinity towards socialism; "In the socialist country, there is no God, no religion, or no belief in Shastras. No human being considered high or low,” he wrote in an essay." It was a philosophy or an -ism he was inspired by and explored it without any prejudice for 'his side'. (And likely high prejudice for the 'other side' due to circumstances, tendencies, etc. which the individuals can judge on their own.)

Religion is just one aspect of spiritualism; its sole purpose is to provide a conduit for the mind to explore deeper enigmatic questions; such as - Who am I? Who is mine? What is my purpose? These are some of the basic questions that every open mind yearns for at some point in his or her life. And these are the questions that philosophers of ancient India like Kanada, Vidyaranya, Ramanujacharya, Siddhartha Gautama, Jaimini and many more in the modern world like Chaitnya Mahaprabhu, Chanakya, Swami Vivekananda & others have examined within. 

And philosophical texts by these philosophers breaks down this world into components that are either physical or abstract in their constitution. The ancient Indian philosophy "divides" itself into six major schools - Nyaya, Vaisheshik, Samkhya, Yoga, Mimansa and Vedanta. All these seem to be looking at the same enigma albeit from six different viewpoints. Some of these viewpoints even talk of an abstract concept of God which borders on atheism sometimes. So, no 'path' is abruptly locked down without having the open-mindedness and courage to tread on it to explore where it takes. 

And for those who read this as the propagation of Hinduism, I can but only repeat the words of Swami Vivekananda he said in Chicago, "The Christian is not to become a Hindu or a Buddhist, nor a Hindu or a Buddhist to become a Christian. But each must assimilate the spirit of the others and yet preserve his individuality and grow according to his own law of growth.

Don't let the political ideologies of anti-"something", or your own personal aversion towards an "-ism" deter you from exploring philosophy (note, I said philosophy, whichever one you want to pick first; from east or west or north or south). It's far too easy to parrot dirt with 140 characters as opposed to opening your mind for an hour to explore the philosophy of life that breaks down the 'self' into its various characteristics. 

So my request is to be students again; someone who was open to the idea of gravity or atom or even sub-atomic particles and walked the path without letting initial bias or aversion preventing you from taking initial steps towards higher education.


(Ref: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/15/b4/1e/15b41e668db7cf739b8ad5fe407ae65c.jpg)
Why am I using the commemorative stamp on Panini as a face for this post, well let's just say he was a student of Sanskrit grammar and spent his time codifying rules that are finding ever-increasing relevance in the modern concepts of machine learning and artificial intelligence. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Scuba Diving 36 feet deep in Goa (Surreal but Nice!)

"Surreal but nice" that's what Hugh Grant's character managed to blurt out, mesmerized by the beauty of Julia Roberts (in the movie Notting Hill ). And this was the exact thought that was running in my mind as I was rising from a depth of over 35 feet under water in the Arabian Sea near Goa, India. I had just finished my first dive (rather second dive of my first dive) with grouper fish, tailor fish - and many more - knelt at the bottom of the ocean floor and touched a ship wreck that sunk more than sixty years ago! It was a surreal experience that has left me with a feeling of self-satisfaction as well as endless curiosity. The two feelings very rarely take a house together in my mind. Probably the last time they shacked up together was when I got an admit for my Master's from State University of New York . The feeling of gliding underwater among the fishes, water pressure trying to burst your ears drums, flying over huge boulders of rocks under sea; like an un...

How not to read History? Avoiding Sophistry, Deceitfulness, and Irrational Narratives

Introduction A few days ago I wrote on how a contemporary Dharmic mind is enslaved with various narratives meant to degrade the tradition of Dharmic spiritualism (or Hinduism) and relegate the spiritual path as non-sensical, patriarchal, and regressive (i.e. against modernity). I've three examples below that show the eagerness in contemporary conversations to push this narrative. Since free speech and vaad (Sanskrit: वाद, discussion) are two-way streets so it's well within my right to share my opinion based on sound reasoning and well-established examples. And my opinion doesn't rely on the play of words (Sanskrit: सामान्य छल, quibble)) or a mere attack on the opposition (Sanskrit: वितंडा, cavil/sophistry). Just a side note, these categorizations are based on the ancient  Nyaya philosophy composed by Akṣapāda Gautama between the 6th century BCE and the 2nd century CE. Example 1 -  वितंडा / Sophistry Buddhism and Sanatana Dharma have a long history of coexistence and assim...
The debate on Times Now Summit 2022 between Salman Khurshid, Dr. Vikram Sampath, Sai Deepak, and Pavan K Varma showed how disconnected the left, right, and the middle are from each other.  We all know these 'luminaries',  as Rahul Shivshankar, Editorial Director & Editor-in-Chief  @TimesNow introduces them.  How left and right  do not apply to Indian political viewpoints  is a matter for another time, therefore pardon my use of the western paradigm of left and right for the rest of this blog post. Times Now Debate, 2022 We all know Sai Deepak through his YouTube debate with  Asaduddin Owaisi  (Sai Deepak in fact moderated the debate) a few years back. And since then he has authored a couple of books on the historical context that surrounded the drafting of the constitution of India between 1946 to 1950. His first book on India, that is Bharat forced us to rethink colonialism and introduced an entirely distinct scholarly way to look at middle-e...