Skip to main content

How Logic is the Foundation of Indic (Hindu) Spiritual Philosophy

Tarkavidya (the science of reasoning and logic)
A painting depicting Tarkavidya (the science of reasoning and logic) in action.

Picture: The famous debate between Adi Shankaracharya and Mandana Mishra, in which Shankaracharya emerged victorious. https://twitter.com/mimansaka/status/1411535285444247556?lang=bg)

Can Science & Religion be reconciled?

I've often wondered if there is a reconciliation of science and religion. In past, I've written about misinterpreting faith, the importance of spiritual philosophies, and spiritualism in the Hindu (or Indian) context. I've also read the likes of Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens, who are the pioneers of the atheistic movement opposing the Abrahamic philosophy, to not limit my view to just my Indic background.

In the western world, more people are identifying as atheists, agnostics, or otherwise nonreligious. Pew Research shows the same trend in the western world when it comes to religion. The same Pew Research also shows the importance of religion in India, across the diverse religions that exist, like Hindu, Muslim, Jain, Sikh, Christian, and others. This disillusionment with religion/spirituality, in my opinion, is driven by the rise of materialism as much as a growing preference to use scientific principles to pursue spiritualism.

Atheism in Hinduism / Dharmic Meaning of Atheism

On a side note, Indians are comfortable with atheism as there isn't a concept of "non-believer" but end-goal (or even lack of it) of human life could be attained through multiple paths. There isn't a single monolithic concept of God that is the only way. So Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, and Sikhs alike are comfortable in their own skin without any denigration of other paths. Indian atheistic philosophies like that of Cārvāka and Jain get clubbed under the western concept of "religion" in the above surveys. However, the nuance of these atheistic philosophies from an Indic (Vedic) perspective is lost. You can read more about Cārvāka here.

I would not digress to other battles that will unnecessarily take up the bandwidth of my limited intellect, for example, people often argue that religion is a system of beliefs that justify a creator and atheism is disbelief in God hence more rational. I don't intend to fall into this trap, as a lot of this is influenced by the Western concept of 'God', or Karl Marx's opposition to supernaturalism and other stereotypes. 

What is Nyāya Philosophy?

My focus will be the Indic philosophy of Nyāya, the word has its roots in Sanskrit, meaning the conclusion of a syllogism. It's also referred to as "Hetu-vidya" the science of causes. And sometimes also referred to as the science of reasoning, as it gives a lot of impetus on what is knowledge, what are tenets, confutation, and fallacy. 

Indic philosophies like Nyāya or Vaiśeṣika begin with simple questions on what is knowledge and understanding of the physical universe instead of commandments. Especially in Nyāya besides the means of right knowledge, the focus is on doubt (Saṃśaya) as well! The basic premise is there will always be multiple theses in the world and we have to carefully maneuver as we go from curiosity to doubt to the right knowledge. It outlines the definitions of each of these steps. 

The natural state of our intellect is to understand the true meaning that always starts as curiosity and ends with final knowledge after removing all doubts. This is the fundamental principle of Nyāya Darshan (न्याय दर्शन) that has been elucidated throughout this ancient Indian treatise on knowledge and logic. It uses epistemology to divide the world into sixteen categories. And each of these is discussed in great detail.

Unfortunately, in the modern world, the focus has shifted to finding ways for easy material gain. Everyone is looking for a quick miracle that can cure diseases, or bring undeserved success overnight or material wealth through unrestricted exploitation of nature. J Sai Deepak in his book, 'India, That is Bharat', discusses in great length how European colonialism followed by modernism and globalization cemented the position of material profit above everything else. 

As the masses thronged for miracles and the thirst for materialism gained momentum the religion (and spirituality) adapted to attract the masses. Perhaps that's where 'religion became the opium of the masses. And somewhere along the line spiritualism started seeking validation from science to justify itself. And in recent times social media popularized notions of the inferiority of religion (and spirituality) as physical proof was given a higher pedestal.

Hindu religion in India too went through a phase of excessive ritualism. And still, there are branches of Hinduism that exclusively deal with ritualism for material gain. However, numerous sages, saints, and reformers have stressed the goal to dispel ignorance (avidya) and strive for knowledge (vidya). And as the world is full of sources that claim to possess the qualities of the right knowledge, it is of utmost importance to be able to differentiate between ignorance and knowledge.

Nyāya Darshan empowers the readers by diving into syllogism (the science of reasoning). As there will be doubts in our curious minds but leading it to the right conclusion will lead to not only enlightenment but also prosperity in the material life. The 'right' conclusion is the topic of the various Sutras of this entire Darshan

This perhaps is the common ground of science and spiritualism. The science of reasoning via logical problem-solving is mandatory for both fields. In an Abrahamic mind, the two may be separated by a chasm that's irreconcilable, but Dharma calls for an intellectual discussion instead of a faith-based system. So both science and spiritualism rely on the same principles of study.

Is science able to explain spiritualism or vice versa? Perhaps we're not yet intellectually developed yet to see these as one realm. And qualms and divisiveness arise due to our shortcomings in observing the onenessHere is a link to the series of lectures on Nyāya Darshan by Acharya Satyajit Arya, in case you're interested in this Indic philosophy from ancient times.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Scuba Diving 36 feet deep in Goa (Surreal but Nice!)

"Surreal but nice" that's what Hugh Grant's character managed to blurt out, mesmerized by the beauty of Julia Roberts (in the movie Notting Hill ). And this was the exact thought that was running in my mind as I was rising from a depth of over 35 feet under water in the Arabian Sea near Goa, India. I had just finished my first dive (rather second dive of my first dive) with grouper fish, tailor fish - and many more - knelt at the bottom of the ocean floor and touched a ship wreck that sunk more than sixty years ago! It was a surreal experience that has left me with a feeling of self-satisfaction as well as endless curiosity. The two feelings very rarely take a house together in my mind. Probably the last time they shacked up together was when I got an admit for my Master's from State University of New York . The feeling of gliding underwater among the fishes, water pressure trying to burst your ears drums, flying over huge boulders of rocks under sea; like an un...

How not to read History? Avoiding Sophistry, Deceitfulness, and Irrational Narratives

Introduction A few days ago I wrote on how a contemporary Dharmic mind is enslaved with various narratives meant to degrade the tradition of Dharmic spiritualism (or Hinduism) and relegate the spiritual path as non-sensical, patriarchal, and regressive (i.e. against modernity). I've three examples below that show the eagerness in contemporary conversations to push this narrative. Since free speech and vaad (Sanskrit: वाद, discussion) are two-way streets so it's well within my right to share my opinion based on sound reasoning and well-established examples. And my opinion doesn't rely on the play of words (Sanskrit: सामान्य छल, quibble)) or a mere attack on the opposition (Sanskrit: वितंडा, cavil/sophistry). Just a side note, these categorizations are based on the ancient  Nyaya philosophy composed by Akṣapāda Gautama between the 6th century BCE and the 2nd century CE. Example 1 -  वितंडा / Sophistry Buddhism and Sanatana Dharma have a long history of coexistence and assim...

9000 days of destiny

I was wondering about my doubts and prejudices I have at this stage of life. It is in human trait to suffer from these emotions. But history has given enough evidence to form a case when humans have risen beyond their flaws I recently saw the movie "Invictus". It is based on the true events that lead to South African national rugby team, the Springboks, winning the 1995 rugby world cup. The movie shows how two persons from completely different backgrounds rose above their beliefs and prejudices to unite a country broken by apartheid. These were South African President Mr. Nelson Mandela and the captain of the South African rugby team Francois Pienaar.  Clint Eastwood directed this movie. It stars Morgan Freeman as Nelson Mandela and Matt Damon as Francois Pienaar. The movie is thought provoking and inspires you to dream big. It in its' limited time depicts the segregation created by decades of apartheid in South Africa. However I was captivated by the song played ...