Introduction
A disclaimer first, I used to be a fan of John Oliver and his show Last Week Tonight. This was when he was bashing Fox News Channel, Republicans, and other conservative opinions as part of his blanket bashing of 'right wing. I was frankly unaware of conservative opinions in the United States. As an immigrant, I had picked up the American political context from whatever limited exposure I had; which was primarily driven by left-liberal ideologues. And it was fun to watch continuously streamed videos of Jon Stewart where he will poke fun at Fox News with cleverly presented arguments. So my opinions were incomplete and unknowingly prejudiced.
However, a world cannot function on such broad and incomplete opinions. Was I left liberal who had a reckoning? I don't think I can say that, as I don't even know if I was or still am a left-liberal or right-wing. As personalities cannot be broad-brushed by placing them in a convenient basked of left, center, or right.
For example, NYT, WaPo, and other American media organizations always begin their op-ed with 'Right-wing Hindu Nationalist government. Now if one were to ask is this really reporting or its intentionally leading the reader down the ideological path the editorial staff of these media organizations wants to propagate. If any neutral editor were to analyze the schemes related to the minority affairs ministry in the government of India then this demonizing of the current political dispensation will be useless but criticism based on reality and on a case-to-case basis, not a sweeping judgment.
Case 1: John Oliver on India's Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019
The strategy used here is demonize Modi, impose unsubstantiated craziness with and then use a divisiveness to "cancel" any further discussion.
Case 2: John Oliver on Critical Race Theory
It's an equally controversial topic where there are misconceptions galore. I personally don't have an opinion as I'm not read well enough on this, so I do have homework here. But the surreptitious duplicity is evident in Season 9 Episode 1 when he covers this theory. And I quote,
"And what Rufo has been cleverly doing is cherry-picking the worst examples he can find of lessons in classrooms or training materials for teachers, and saying, “that is CRT.” The goal is to have the public read something crazy in the newspaper and immediately think ‘Critical Race Theory.'
And the thing is, it fucking worked. Because whenever you hear “CRT” now, you are not hearing about the academic discipline. You’re hearing about a category so broad it encompasses both “the craziest thing in the newspaper” and also, crucially, “any conversation about race that someone does not want to have."
John Oliver gives enough leeway to CRT to ensure the true crux of the serious matter can be separated from all the noise surrounding it. He admits that just talking about CRT in a general sense broadly encompasses the truth and the lies.
Conclusion
Everyone has a right to an opinion and this is enshrined in the flawed right to free speech; intentionally calling it flawed because so-called 'blasphemy' can easily trample such right by use of might and violence. The "toolkit" of left-liberal ideologues is quite simple and effective:
- Demonize the leading voices of opposition, using half-baked research that is driven by conspiracies and incomplete narratives
- Secondly, enwrap the entire opposition in a blanket of "crazy" using fringe examples
Comments
Post a Comment