Skip to main content

The Bigotry of John Oliver: Exposing the Left Liberals' Hollow Method of Reasoning

Introduction

A disclaimer first, I used to be a fan of John Oliver and his show Last Week Tonight. This was when he was bashing Fox News Channel, Republicans, and other conservative opinions as part of his blanket bashing of 'right wing. I was frankly unaware of conservative opinions in the United States. As an immigrant, I had picked up the American political context from whatever limited exposure I had; which was primarily driven by left-liberal ideologues. And it was fun to watch continuously streamed videos of Jon Stewart where he will poke fun at Fox News with cleverly presented arguments. So my opinions were incomplete and unknowingly prejudiced.

However, a world cannot function on such broad and incomplete opinions. Was I left liberal who had a reckoning? I don't think I can say that, as I don't even know if I was or still am a left-liberal or right-wing. As personalities cannot be broad-brushed by placing them in a convenient basked of left, center, or right. 

For example, NYT, WaPo, and other American media organizations always begin their op-ed with 'Right-wing Hindu Nationalist government. Now if one were to ask is this really reporting or its intentionally leading the reader down the ideological path the editorial staff of these media organizations wants to propagate. If any neutral editor were to analyze the schemes related to the minority affairs ministry in the government of India then this demonizing of the current political dispensation will be useless but criticism based on reality and on a case-to-case basis, not a sweeping judgment.

Case 1: John Oliver on India's Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019

Now let's look at John Oliver's routine on Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government's Citizenship Amendment Act. And I quote his Season 7 Episode 2, "Modi's government also introduced the Citizenship Amendment Bill, CAB, which granted citizenship to undocumented people if they were from any religious minority but Muslims." This is after he has already built up Narendra Modi as a Hindu nationalist and a right-wing. And then comes the lies and misleading narrative. The leading newspapers and Home Minister himself have clarified on such misconceptions numerous times but John Oliver & his team continue to propagate the lies. And subsequent arguments by him are based on a false foundation so discussing them individually is a futile exercise.
The strategy used here is demonize Modi, impose unsubstantiated craziness with   and then use a divisiveness to "cancel" any further discussion.

Case 2: John Oliver on Critical Race Theory

It's an equally controversial topic where there are misconceptions galore. I personally don't have an opinion as I'm not read well enough on this, so I do have homework here. But the surreptitious duplicity is evident in Season 9 Episode 1 when he covers this theory. And I quote,

"And what Rufo has been cleverly doing is cherry-picking the worst examples he can find of lessons in classrooms or training materials for teachers, and saying, “that is CRT.” The goal is to have the public read something crazy in the newspaper and immediately think ‘Critical Race Theory.'

And the thing is, it fucking worked. Because whenever you hear “CRT” now, you are not hearing about the academic discipline. You’re hearing about a category so broad it encompasses both “the craziest thing in the newspaper” and also, crucially, “any conversation about race that someone does not want to have."

John Oliver gives enough leeway to CRT to ensure the true crux of the serious matter can be separated from all the noise surrounding it. He admits that just talking about CRT in a general sense broadly encompasses the truth and the lies. 

Conclusion

Everyone has a right to an opinion and this is enshrined in the flawed right to free speech; intentionally calling it flawed because so-called 'blasphemy' can easily trample such right by use of might and violence. The "toolkit" of left-liberal ideologues is quite simple and effective:

  • Demonize the leading voices of opposition, using half-baked research that is driven by conspiracies and incomplete narratives
  • Secondly, enwrap the entire opposition in a blanket of "crazy" using fringe examples
This is evident in the Modi episode. Firstly Narendra Modi was demonized for the Gujarat riots of 2002 with no mention of a trigger event or the fact Supreme Court of India didn't find any wrongdoing on Modi's part. And then enshrouding Citizenship Amendment Act in a blanket of crazy conspiracies with lazy research that didn't even delve into the fact that the current opposition party promulgated something similar way back in 2003! And that document is still available in the public domain here.




It's up to us to look at and analyze all sides before jumping to conclusions like John Oliver.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Scuba Diving 36 feet deep in Goa (Surreal but Nice!)

"Surreal but nice" that's what Hugh Grant's character managed to blurt out, mesmerized by the beauty of Julia Roberts (in the movie Notting Hill ). And this was the exact thought that was running in my mind as I was rising from a depth of over 35 feet under water in the Arabian Sea near Goa, India. I had just finished my first dive (rather second dive of my first dive) with grouper fish, tailor fish - and many more - knelt at the bottom of the ocean floor and touched a ship wreck that sunk more than sixty years ago! It was a surreal experience that has left me with a feeling of self-satisfaction as well as endless curiosity. The two feelings very rarely take a house together in my mind. Probably the last time they shacked up together was when I got an admit for my Master's from State University of New York . The feeling of gliding underwater among the fishes, water pressure trying to burst your ears drums, flying over huge boulders of rocks under sea; like an un...

How not to read History? Avoiding Sophistry, Deceitfulness, and Irrational Narratives

Introduction A few days ago I wrote on how a contemporary Dharmic mind is enslaved with various narratives meant to degrade the tradition of Dharmic spiritualism (or Hinduism) and relegate the spiritual path as non-sensical, patriarchal, and regressive (i.e. against modernity). I've three examples below that show the eagerness in contemporary conversations to push this narrative. Since free speech and vaad (Sanskrit: वाद, discussion) are two-way streets so it's well within my right to share my opinion based on sound reasoning and well-established examples. And my opinion doesn't rely on the play of words (Sanskrit: सामान्य छल, quibble)) or a mere attack on the opposition (Sanskrit: वितंडा, cavil/sophistry). Just a side note, these categorizations are based on the ancient  Nyaya philosophy composed by Akṣapāda Gautama between the 6th century BCE and the 2nd century CE. Example 1 -  वितंडा / Sophistry Buddhism and Sanatana Dharma have a long history of coexistence and assim...

9000 days of destiny

I was wondering about my doubts and prejudices I have at this stage of life. It is in human trait to suffer from these emotions. But history has given enough evidence to form a case when humans have risen beyond their flaws I recently saw the movie "Invictus". It is based on the true events that lead to South African national rugby team, the Springboks, winning the 1995 rugby world cup. The movie shows how two persons from completely different backgrounds rose above their beliefs and prejudices to unite a country broken by apartheid. These were South African President Mr. Nelson Mandela and the captain of the South African rugby team Francois Pienaar.  Clint Eastwood directed this movie. It stars Morgan Freeman as Nelson Mandela and Matt Damon as Francois Pienaar. The movie is thought provoking and inspires you to dream big. It in its' limited time depicts the segregation created by decades of apartheid in South Africa. However I was captivated by the song played ...