Skip to main content

Book Recommendation: Shadow of the Great Game

As a kid, I was fascinated by the section on Indus Valley Civilization in my history book at school. To imagine an ancient India where the cities were laid out in a Manhattan-like grid, with an upper and a lower city, an advanced drainage system, and ports from where traders traveled as far as ancient Sumeria or Egypt. It's just a captivating part of our country's ancient history. I let my imagination run far with some help from the pictures of Mohenjo-daro, Harappa or Dholavira but I'm unable to relate to these ancient ancestors that traversed the same land where I was born thousands of millennia later.
Seal from Indus Valley Civilization
Living Modern History

And then I have the modern history of India when the entire concept of India was formed from scratch. It was in the time of Dadabhai Naoroji, Gopal Krishna Gokhale,  Lala Lajpat Rai, Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Motilal Nehru, Mahatama Gandhi and other leaders of modern India spent decades of their lives to build the country where I live. This is the part of history that was presented to us in mere captions in the history books I read during my school years. What really happened in the 19th and first half of the 20th century that unchained the shackles of colonialism whether by Mughals or by Britishers later.
Mahatama Gandhi
We proudly used words like democracy, secular, liberal, etc. in the modern context but unless you delve into the historical events that shaped modern India you'll never realize the importance of freedom we celebrate every year. I don't remember much of the history I read during my school years as it never helped to form a timeline in my head. At best it was a collection of scattered events with no background on the significance of each event in shaping India and even the world we live in the current times.

The Book - Shadow of the Great Game
Shadow of the Great Game
With these gaps in historical knowledge and an equal amount of curiosity in understanding the history of my own country, I turned to the book 'The Shadow of the Great Game (The Untold Story of India's Partition)' by Narendra Singh Sarila. A few words about the author first, Narendra Singh was heir to the tiny princedom of Sarila in central India and later became the aide-de-camp to Lord Mountbatten, the last viceroy of India i.e. last of the representative of British Monarchs who had absolute powers over affairs in India as well as the first governor-general of Independent India. 

Narendra Singh witnessed history as Lord Mountbatten worked with Indian nationalists to not only achieve Purna Swaraj but also help accede over 500 princely states to form the modern Indian map. He saw the internal dynamics of the process that partitioned India into India and Pakistan. An event that was disordered at best and driven by the British view of their future strategic interest than by any other influencing factor. This book is the story of the agreement to partition India that was announced on 3rd June 1947 but decades of associated events filled prejudices, hidden agendas, betrayals and violence that culminated in two countries that continue to have discord on the unsolved issues from those time. 

The Great Game - Partition of India was about Oil! And 'Divide and Rule' was all Business.
Special Refuge Train in Ambala
Britain during those years was the dying superpower that was slowly and unwantedly handing that mantle to the US, the undoubted leader of the Western world in the fight against the Axis Powers. Britain had realized that the US will support India's freedom from colonialism and in fact, recognized the Indian aspirations for full freedom after Congress voted for it in 1930. The Allied Powers, including Britain and the US, had already begun to entangle with the growing influence of the former USSR. And Britain had earmarked northwest of India 'abutting Afghanistan and Iran' as the next battleground for the fight against communism. The book quotes Ernest Bevin, the British foreign secretary, stating 'the division of India would help to consolidate Britain in the Middle East'. 

And some of the quotes from the book opened my eyes about the geopolitics of those times:

  • The three Afghan wars of 1839–42, 1878–80 and 1919 were to ensure 'India's western approached from slipping under Russian influence'. 
  • It's also interesting to read how the end of the First World War help Britain 'carve out the states of Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Jordan from the remnants of the now-defeated Ottoman Empire'. 
  • And equally interesting to know the intentions of the British to carve out a territory from northwest India to protects the 'big oil fields of Mesopotamia and Persia'. 'British interest in souther Persia was centered around oil', Ardershir Zahedi, son-in-law of the foreign minister of Iran in 1920s. 
  • On the day Germany surrendered, Prime Minister Churchill ' ordered an appraisal of the long-term policy required to safeguard the strategic interests of the British Empire in Inda and the Indian Ocean'!
  • The aforementioned report talked about detaching Baluchistan from India and every subsequent report talked about the special importance of northwest India
  • The book also states that the British intended to use their "link" with Pakistan as a stabilizing effect on India as a whole i.e. an attack by Hindustan on Pakistan would involve Hindustan in war, not with Pakistan alone, but also with the British Commonwealth. 
  • And it believed that maintain relations between the tribes and Pakistan would be easier than they could be with a united India. 

The book also takes you through Jinnah's political struggle and eventually his idea of Pakistan. And ponders on the question 'how could the Jinnah's scheme of Two Nation Theory be justified when nearly 25 to 30 million Muslims would be left out of the Islamic state of Pakistan?' 

And how the Kashmir imbroglio was mainly driven by British belief that if India acquired Gilgit it would not permit any anti-Soviet moves to be made from there. And on the other hand, Jinnah had already agreed to cooperate with Britain on matters of defense! 
Kashmir, Jammu & Ladakh
It startled me that two British Officers of the Gilgit Scouts, William Alexander Brown and A.S. Mathieson swore to serve the Maharaj of J&K but continued to coordinate with Peshawar in Pakistan! Fast forward a few decades and you can see that this misplaced sense of loyalty is the reason that this region is still troubled with violence. And how Britain used this to enforce the now so-called line of control. And the Pakistani tribal invasion of Kashmir, Jammu & Ladakh, which under the guise of liberating Muslims tried to annex a Buddhist majority Ladakh as well!  

Overall this book gives an interesting viewpoint on the underlying game that was played to divide India into two countries. A must-read for any history enthusiast.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Scuba Diving 36 feet deep in Goa (Surreal but Nice!)

"Surreal but nice" that's what Hugh Grant's character managed to blurt out, mesmerized by the beauty of Julia Roberts (in the movie Notting Hill ). And this was the exact thought that was running in my mind as I was rising from a depth of over 35 feet under water in the Arabian Sea near Goa, India. I had just finished my first dive (rather second dive of my first dive) with grouper fish, tailor fish - and many more - knelt at the bottom of the ocean floor and touched a ship wreck that sunk more than sixty years ago! It was a surreal experience that has left me with a feeling of self-satisfaction as well as endless curiosity. The two feelings very rarely take a house together in my mind. Probably the last time they shacked up together was when I got an admit for my Master's from State University of New York . The feeling of gliding underwater among the fishes, water pressure trying to burst your ears drums, flying over huge boulders of rocks under sea; like an un...

How not to read History? Avoiding Sophistry, Deceitfulness, and Irrational Narratives

Introduction A few days ago I wrote on how a contemporary Dharmic mind is enslaved with various narratives meant to degrade the tradition of Dharmic spiritualism (or Hinduism) and relegate the spiritual path as non-sensical, patriarchal, and regressive (i.e. against modernity). I've three examples below that show the eagerness in contemporary conversations to push this narrative. Since free speech and vaad (Sanskrit: वाद, discussion) are two-way streets so it's well within my right to share my opinion based on sound reasoning and well-established examples. And my opinion doesn't rely on the play of words (Sanskrit: सामान्य छल, quibble)) or a mere attack on the opposition (Sanskrit: वितंडा, cavil/sophistry). Just a side note, these categorizations are based on the ancient  Nyaya philosophy composed by Akṣapāda Gautama between the 6th century BCE and the 2nd century CE. Example 1 -  वितंडा / Sophistry Buddhism and Sanatana Dharma have a long history of coexistence and assim...

9000 days of destiny

I was wondering about my doubts and prejudices I have at this stage of life. It is in human trait to suffer from these emotions. But history has given enough evidence to form a case when humans have risen beyond their flaws I recently saw the movie "Invictus". It is based on the true events that lead to South African national rugby team, the Springboks, winning the 1995 rugby world cup. The movie shows how two persons from completely different backgrounds rose above their beliefs and prejudices to unite a country broken by apartheid. These were South African President Mr. Nelson Mandela and the captain of the South African rugby team Francois Pienaar.  Clint Eastwood directed this movie. It stars Morgan Freeman as Nelson Mandela and Matt Damon as Francois Pienaar. The movie is thought provoking and inspires you to dream big. It in its' limited time depicts the segregation created by decades of apartheid in South Africa. However I was captivated by the song played ...