Skip to main content

The Art of Purva-paksha in Vaisheshik Darshan

What is purva-paksha? 

Vaisheshik Darshan throughout the text is not afraid to question the observation and heavily relies on 'purva-paksha' i.e. debating a former argument to solidify the proposition. Vaisheshik Darshan doesn't just state aphorisms, but it takes the reader (you) inside the mind of the author, as he grapples with observations & inferences. And this grappling often leads to counter-argument, which in the case of this Darshan is included in the text itself! You won't see any other philosophical treatise, other than Indic texts, where the counter-argument is part of the journey a reader has to take to deep dive into the topic for a clear understanding. 

As we go through the proof of one of the nine Dravyas (substances) i.e. Atman (misinterpreted as the soul in Western translation but actually means the reality of realization of our existence i.e. the true "I"), the author uses counter-arguments to facilitate the proof. For example, we realize through common knowledge that senses (i.e. sight, taste, smell, touch, and hearing) by themselves are just instruments that require a "user" to understand the information gathered from objects (for example a flower). But Sutra 3.1.3 states that this by itself isn't proof of atman!

So this debate between the author and purva-paksha continues until it leads to clarity. It's a unique way of debating among oneself within your own treatise (or text)! It's a wonderful way of honing the firmness of understanding and listening to different perspectives. It's the ultimate art of listening and being open. And Maharishi Kanada incorporated it in his philosophical treatise thousands of years ago.

While Vaisheshik Darshan uses this methodology to 'debate' and hone in on the 'right answer'; the Nyaya Darshan (or The Nyāya Sutras of Gautama) explores the epistemology itself. It delves into the various means of knowledge and how anyone can ensure that the knowledge and conclusions thereof are in fact correct. It is the science of inquiry or the science of reasoning. I'll be writing on Nyaya Darshan in near future. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Scuba Diving 36 feet deep in Goa (Surreal but Nice!)

"Surreal but nice" that's what Hugh Grant's character managed to blurt out, mesmerized by the beauty of Julia Roberts (in the movie Notting Hill ). And this was the exact thought that was running in my mind as I was rising from a depth of over 35 feet under water in the Arabian Sea near Goa, India. I had just finished my first dive (rather second dive of my first dive) with grouper fish, tailor fish - and many more - knelt at the bottom of the ocean floor and touched a ship wreck that sunk more than sixty years ago! It was a surreal experience that has left me with a feeling of self-satisfaction as well as endless curiosity. The two feelings very rarely take a house together in my mind. Probably the last time they shacked up together was when I got an admit for my Master's from State University of New York . The feeling of gliding underwater among the fishes, water pressure trying to burst your ears drums, flying over huge boulders of rocks under sea; like an un...
The debate on Times Now Summit 2022 between Salman Khurshid, Dr. Vikram Sampath, Sai Deepak, and Pavan K Varma showed how disconnected the left, right, and the middle are from each other.  We all know these 'luminaries',  as Rahul Shivshankar, Editorial Director & Editor-in-Chief  @TimesNow introduces them.  How left and right  do not apply to Indian political viewpoints  is a matter for another time, therefore pardon my use of the western paradigm of left and right for the rest of this blog post. Times Now Debate, 2022 We all know Sai Deepak through his YouTube debate with  Asaduddin Owaisi  (Sai Deepak in fact moderated the debate) a few years back. And since then he has authored a couple of books on the historical context that surrounded the drafting of the constitution of India between 1946 to 1950. His first book on India, that is Bharat forced us to rethink colonialism and introduced an entirely distinct scholarly way to look at middle-e...