Skip to main content

Can you tell me?

Quarter-life Crisis


The years from twenty five to twenty nine are a weird experience; at least that’s how they are turning out for me. The word weird here is a mixture of humour as well as distress. These are the years when you’re well past your adolescent days. You’ve moved through the puberty into the maturity carrying the burden of college degrees. You even got your first job and were very content making that monthly loan installment towards the education loan. Your college buddies who looked doomed seem to be doing fine. Your friends, like you, seem to be doomed for an unknown amount of time to follow. You’re pretty sure you will lead the pack of your doomed friends. Maybe you’ve a relationship with a girl or a guy who has managed to stick with you through these waves of changes. Or you’re still not sure whether it is worth to be in a relationship. For others this part was all but happiness. However your parents and mentors have showered you with enough wisdom about the opportunities and misfortunes that tend to follow any worldly creature. Even you have managed to etch an assortment of lessons in your mind through your experiences with people and places. Your job pays you enough to maintain a good lifestyle and you even have the liberty to make some financial blunders. Things are not as bad as they seem to be. You’re progressing slowly but surely. You have enough measures to assess the journey of life.

But suddenly you’re hit by a quarter-life crisis. The crisis of realizing what you don’t want but not sure what you want. The inertia of not making decisions has slowed you down to almost a standstill. You want to move but far too many doubts are hovering over you. You’re too far to go back and change a few things. At the same time the future is still distant and too vague to have the comfort of surety. The gut feeling seems to have died and it is far too noisy to hear your own inner voice. Job, friends, romance, money and other things are topics you would rather not talk about. However everybody else seems to be interested in talking about these. You want to speak out but are afraid nobody would understand you. Your parents and mentors are too secure to understand your insecurity. Your peers are fighting their own battles and would prefer a good time rather than a scary insight. Your search for your philosophy of life seems to be taking you nowhere. The moments of security and comfort you draw from others’ success stories are shredded by the haunting truths of the present. The feeling of anything is possible still exists but is restricted by the blandness of the present. Welcome to the quarter-life crisis! I didn’t knew a quarter-life crisis existed; until when it suddenly hit me. I was taken aback by this brute force that is seemingly impossible to conquer. Is it too late to change things or do I really need to change?

Is there a way through this mess? Most of us do hope so. But if there is a way I don’t know of it; at least right now. Do you?


An essay by.


Pushkar Bajpai

Comments

  1. My dear Pushkar,

    I want to have a clarity over a few points, what you have mentioned. Do you mean that you are looking for a purpose? Or is it the crisis evolved out of run-of-the-mill life?

    As you say " Job, friends, romance, money and other things are topics you would rather not talk about".

    ReplyDelete
  2. I should be careful here as purpose essentially means the outcome. It is different from knowing what you don't want and not knowing what you want. Because for me "want" is a journey rather than the end result. For example: I "want" to write. Why? Because I love when I can create a piece of writing through some words. It's fulfilling. While purpose is more about expectations you want to achieve from doing something. The purpose of writing could be to make money.

    Crisis is a result of losing the self-identity; losing my inner voice in the noise of world. Unable to move as you don't know what your steps should be! That's my take on it. Thanks for reading.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Scuba Diving 36 feet deep in Goa (Surreal but Nice!)

"Surreal but nice" that's what Hugh Grant's character managed to blurt out, mesmerized by the beauty of Julia Roberts (in the movie Notting Hill ). And this was the exact thought that was running in my mind as I was rising from a depth of over 35 feet under water in the Arabian Sea near Goa, India. I had just finished my first dive (rather second dive of my first dive) with grouper fish, tailor fish - and many more - knelt at the bottom of the ocean floor and touched a ship wreck that sunk more than sixty years ago! It was a surreal experience that has left me with a feeling of self-satisfaction as well as endless curiosity. The two feelings very rarely take a house together in my mind. Probably the last time they shacked up together was when I got an admit for my Master's from State University of New York . The feeling of gliding underwater among the fishes, water pressure trying to burst your ears drums, flying over huge boulders of rocks under sea; like an un...

How not to read History? Avoiding Sophistry, Deceitfulness, and Irrational Narratives

Introduction A few days ago I wrote on how a contemporary Dharmic mind is enslaved with various narratives meant to degrade the tradition of Dharmic spiritualism (or Hinduism) and relegate the spiritual path as non-sensical, patriarchal, and regressive (i.e. against modernity). I've three examples below that show the eagerness in contemporary conversations to push this narrative. Since free speech and vaad (Sanskrit: वाद, discussion) are two-way streets so it's well within my right to share my opinion based on sound reasoning and well-established examples. And my opinion doesn't rely on the play of words (Sanskrit: सामान्य छल, quibble)) or a mere attack on the opposition (Sanskrit: वितंडा, cavil/sophistry). Just a side note, these categorizations are based on the ancient  Nyaya philosophy composed by Akṣapāda Gautama between the 6th century BCE and the 2nd century CE. Example 1 -  वितंडा / Sophistry Buddhism and Sanatana Dharma have a long history of coexistence and assim...
The debate on Times Now Summit 2022 between Salman Khurshid, Dr. Vikram Sampath, Sai Deepak, and Pavan K Varma showed how disconnected the left, right, and the middle are from each other.  We all know these 'luminaries',  as Rahul Shivshankar, Editorial Director & Editor-in-Chief  @TimesNow introduces them.  How left and right  do not apply to Indian political viewpoints  is a matter for another time, therefore pardon my use of the western paradigm of left and right for the rest of this blog post. Times Now Debate, 2022 We all know Sai Deepak through his YouTube debate with  Asaduddin Owaisi  (Sai Deepak in fact moderated the debate) a few years back. And since then he has authored a couple of books on the historical context that surrounded the drafting of the constitution of India between 1946 to 1950. His first book on India, that is Bharat forced us to rethink colonialism and introduced an entirely distinct scholarly way to look at middle-e...